Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Pakistan: Buffalo — Manure management

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
54.70 million kg
in 2023
Pakistan
402.90 million kg
in 2023
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
7th
Pakistan rank
4th

Buffalo — Manure management over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
  • Pakistan
0100.0M200.0M300.0M400.0M196119922023

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 402.90 million kg against 54.70 million kg in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), a difference of 348.20 million kg.

That makes Pakistan's figure about 7.4 times Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Pakistan has been ahead every year.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 7th and Pakistan ranks 4th of 26 groups.

Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Pakistan Difference Ahead
1960s 21.06 million kg 70.73 million kg 49.66 million kg Pakistan
1970s 28.36 million kg 92.26 million kg 63.90 million kg Pakistan
1980s 43.52 million kg 124.76 million kg 81.24 million kg Pakistan
1990s 55.89 million kg 175.32 million kg 119.43 million kg Pakistan
2000s 64.19 million kg 233.82 million kg 169.63 million kg Pakistan
2010s 74.72 million kg 314.14 million kg 239.43 million kg Pakistan
2020s 69.33 million kg 385.79 million kg 316.46 million kg Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher buffalo — manure management, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or Pakistan?
Pakistan, at 402.90 million kg against 54.70 million kg in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) as of 2023.
What is the difference in buffalo — manure management between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Pakistan?
348.20 million kg, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Pakistan?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Pakistan rank globally for buffalo — manure management?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 7th and Pakistan ranks 4th of 26 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Buffalo — Manure management (manure treated, N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Pakistan: Buffalo — Manure management. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/buffalo-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/buffalo-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/pakistan/">Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Pakistan: Buffalo — Manure management</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Buffalo — Manure management (manure treated, N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
97 places, 4,384 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).