Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Philippines: Buffalo — Manure management

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
28.02 million kg
in 2023
Philippines
55.45 million kg
in 2023
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
8th
Philippines rank
5th

Buffalo — Manure management over time

  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
  • Philippines
020.0M40.0M60.0M80.0M100.0M196119922023

How they compare

Philippines currently reports 55.45 million kg against 28.02 million kg in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), a difference of 27.42 million kg.

That makes Philippines's figure about 2.0 times Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Philippines has been ahead every year.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 8th and Philippines ranks 5th of 26 groups.

Philippines has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Philippines Difference Ahead
1960s 8.13 million kg 72.98 million kg 64.85 million kg Philippines
1970s 14.38 million kg 75.34 million kg 60.96 million kg Philippines
1980s 24.52 million kg 58.24 million kg 33.72 million kg Philippines
1990s 29.07 million kg 55.25 million kg 26.17 million kg Philippines
2000s 36.63 million kg 64.70 million kg 28.07 million kg Philippines
2010s 46.55 million kg 58.80 million kg 12.25 million kg Philippines
2020s 42.15 million kg 56.25 million kg 14.10 million kg Philippines

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher buffalo — manure management, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or Philippines?
Philippines, at 55.45 million kg against 28.02 million kg in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) as of 2023.
What is the difference in buffalo — manure management between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Philippines?
27.42 million kg, with Philippines ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Philippines?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Philippines rank globally for buffalo — manure management?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 8th and Philippines ranks 5th of 26 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Buffalo — Manure management (manure treated, N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Philippines: Buffalo — Manure management. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/buffalo-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/philippines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/buffalo-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/philippines/">Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Philippines: Buffalo — Manure management</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Buffalo — Manure management (manure treated, N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
97 places, 4,384 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).