Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Thailand: Buffalo — Manure management

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
28.02 million kg
in 2023
Thailand
17.77 million kg
in 2023
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
8th
Thailand rank
11th

Buffalo — Manure management over time

  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
  • Thailand
025.0M50.0M75.0M100.0M125.0M196119922023

How they compare

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 28.02 million kg against 17.77 million kg in Thailand, a difference of 10.25 million kg.

That makes Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s figure about 1.6 times Thailand's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Thailand ahead.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 8th and Thailand ranks 11th of 26 groups.

Across the 7 decades both report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) averaged higher in 3 and Thailand in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Thailand Difference Ahead
1960s 8.13 million kg 105.99 million kg 97.86 million kg Thailand
1970s 14.38 million kg 114.17 million kg 99.79 million kg Thailand
1980s 24.52 million kg 120.84 million kg 96.32 million kg Thailand
1990s 29.07 million kg 77.45 million kg 48.38 million kg Thailand
2000s 36.63 million kg 33.80 million kg 2.83 million kg Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2010s 46.55 million kg 25.33 million kg 21.22 million kg Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2020s 42.15 million kg 20.04 million kg 22.12 million kg Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher buffalo — manure management, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or Thailand?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 28.02 million kg against 17.77 million kg in Thailand as of 2023.
What is the difference in buffalo — manure management between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Thailand?
10.25 million kg, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Thailand?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Thailand rank globally for buffalo — manure management?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 8th and Thailand ranks 11th of 26 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Buffalo — Manure management (manure treated, N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Thailand: Buffalo — Manure management. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/buffalo-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/thailand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/buffalo-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/thailand/">Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Thailand: Buffalo — Manure management</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Buffalo — Manure management (manure treated, N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
97 places, 4,384 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).