Serbia and Montenegro vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Buffalo — Manure management
Buffalo — Manure management over time
- Serbia and Montenegro
- Sub-Saharan Africa
How they compare
Serbia and Montenegro currently reports 1.26 million kg against 44.38 kg in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 1.26 million kg.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Serbia and Montenegro has been ahead every year.
Serbia and Montenegro ranks 21st and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 23rd of 60 countries.
Serbia and Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia and Montenegro | Sub-Saharan Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 823,878 kg | 44.38 kg | 823,833 kg | Serbia and Montenegro |
| 2000s | 1.20 million kg | 44.38 kg | 1.20 million kg | Serbia and Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher buffalo — manure management, Serbia and Montenegro or Sub-Saharan Africa?
- Serbia and Montenegro, at 1.26 million kg against 44.38 kg in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2005.
- What is the difference in buffalo — manure management between Serbia and Montenegro and Sub-Saharan Africa?
- 1.26 million kg, with Serbia and Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Montenegro and Sub-Saharan Africa?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2005.
- How do Serbia and Montenegro and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for buffalo — manure management?
- Serbia and Montenegro ranks 21st and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 23rd of 60 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Buffalo — Manure management (manure treated, N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).