China, Hong Kong SAR vs Jordan: Buffalo — Stocks

China, Hong Kong SAR
335 An
in 2023
Jordan
93 An
in 2023
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
42nd
Jordan rank
43rd

Buffalo — Stocks over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Jordan
05001.0k1.5k2.0k196119922023

How they compare

China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports 335 An against 93 An in Jordan, a difference of 242 An.

That makes China, Hong Kong SAR's figure about 3.6 times Jordan's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 42nd and Jordan ranks 43rd of 60 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 6 and Jordan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Jordan Difference Ahead
1960s 1,467 An 200 An 1,267 An China, Hong Kong SAR
1970s 843.9 An 188 An 655.9 An China, Hong Kong SAR
1980s 97 An 149.2 An 52.2 An Jordan
1990s 168 An 140 An 28 An China, Hong Kong SAR
2000s 274 An 100 An 174 An China, Hong Kong SAR
2010s 300.9 An 97.9 An 203 An China, Hong Kong SAR
2020s 332.25 An 93.25 An 239 An China, Hong Kong SAR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher buffalo — stocks, China, Hong Kong SAR or Jordan?
China, Hong Kong SAR, at 335 An against 93 An in Jordan as of 2023.
What is the difference in buffalo — stocks between China, Hong Kong SAR and Jordan?
242 An, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Jordan?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Jordan rank globally for buffalo — stocks?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 42nd and Jordan ranks 43rd of 60 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Buffalo — Stocks. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Jordan: Buffalo — Stocks. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/buffalo-stocks-2/china-hong-kong-sar/jordan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/buffalo-stocks-2/china-hong-kong-sar/jordan/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Jordan: Buffalo — Stocks</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Buffalo — Stocks
Unit
An
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
97 places, 4,384 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).