China, Hong Kong SAR vs Singapore: Buffalo — Stocks

China, Hong Kong SAR
335 An
in 2023
Singapore
20 An
in 1991
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
42nd
Singapore rank
45th

Buffalo — Stocks over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Singapore
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k196119922023

How they compare

China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports 335 An against 20 An in Singapore, a difference of 315 An.

That makes China, Hong Kong SAR's figure about 16.8 times Singapore's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Singapore ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 42nd and Singapore ranks 45th of 60 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 1 and Singapore in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Singapore Difference Ahead
1960s 1,467 An 3,171 An 1,704 An Singapore
1970s 843.9 An 1,980 An 1,136 An Singapore
1980s 97 An 245 An 148 An Singapore
1990s 150 An 25 An 125 An China, Hong Kong SAR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher buffalo — stocks, China, Hong Kong SAR or Singapore?
China, Hong Kong SAR, at 335 An against 20 An in Singapore as of 2023.
What is the difference in buffalo — stocks between China, Hong Kong SAR and Singapore?
315 An, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Singapore?
31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Singapore rank globally for buffalo — stocks?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 42nd and Singapore ranks 45th of 60 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Buffalo — Stocks. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Singapore: Buffalo — Stocks. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/buffalo-stocks-2/china-hong-kong-sar/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/buffalo-stocks-2/china-hong-kong-sar/singapore/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Singapore: Buffalo — Stocks</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Buffalo — Stocks
Unit
An
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
97 places, 4,384 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).