China, mainland vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Buffalo — Stocks

China, mainland
31.53 million An
in 2023
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
3.10 million An
in 2023
China, mainland rank
4th
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
8th

Buffalo — Stocks over time

  • China, mainland
  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
010.0M20.0M30.0M196119922023

How they compare

China, mainland currently reports 31.53 million An against 3.10 million An in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), a difference of 28.42 million An.

That makes China, mainland's figure about 10.2 times Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s.

Across all 63 years both countries report, China, mainland has been ahead every year.

China, mainland ranks 4th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 8th of 60 countries.

China, mainland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, mainland Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Difference Ahead
1960s 11.56 million An 905,544 An 10.65 million An China, mainland
1970s 17.13 million An 1.60 million An 15.53 million An China, mainland
1980s 19.61 million An 2.74 million An 16.88 million An China, mainland
1990s 22.07 million An 3.23 million An 18.84 million An China, mainland
2000s 23.40 million An 4.07 million An 19.33 million An China, mainland
2010s 27.42 million An 5.17 million An 22.24 million An China, mainland
2020s 30.08 million An 4.68 million An 25.40 million An China, mainland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher buffalo — stocks, China, mainland or Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
China, mainland, at 31.53 million An against 3.10 million An in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) as of 2023.
What is the difference in buffalo — stocks between China, mainland and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
28.42 million An, with China, mainland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, mainland and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China, mainland and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank globally for buffalo — stocks?
China, mainland ranks 4th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 8th of 60 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Buffalo — Stocks. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, mainland vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Buffalo — Stocks. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/buffalo-stocks-2/china-mainland/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/buffalo-stocks-2/china-mainland/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/">China, mainland vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Buffalo — Stocks</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Buffalo — Stocks
Unit
An
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
97 places, 4,384 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).