China, Taiwan Province of vs Suriname: Buffalo — Stocks

China, Taiwan Province of
2,011 An
in 2023
Suriname
1,023 An
in 2023
China, Taiwan Province of rank
35th
Suriname rank
36th

Buffalo — Stocks over time

  • China, Taiwan Province of
  • Suriname
0100.0k200.0k300.0k196119922023

How they compare

China, Taiwan Province of currently reports 2,011 An against 1,023 An in Suriname, a difference of 988 An.

That makes China, Taiwan Province of's figure about 2.0 times Suriname's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, China, Taiwan Province of has been ahead every year.

China, Taiwan Province of ranks 35th and Suriname ranks 36th of 60 countries.

China, Taiwan Province of has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Taiwan Province of Suriname Difference Ahead
1960s 281,025 An 0 An 281,025 An China, Taiwan Province of
1970s 136,084 An 0 An 136,084 An China, Taiwan Province of
1980s 44,401 An 275.8 An 44,125 An China, Taiwan Province of
1990s 15,024 An 659.6 An 14,365 An China, Taiwan Province of
2000s 4,809 An 517.5 An 4,292 An China, Taiwan Province of
2010s 2,782 An 805.1 An 1,977 An China, Taiwan Province of
2020s 2,011 An 1,050 An 961.5 An China, Taiwan Province of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher buffalo — stocks, China, Taiwan Province of or Suriname?
China, Taiwan Province of, at 2,011 An against 1,023 An in Suriname as of 2023.
What is the difference in buffalo — stocks between China, Taiwan Province of and Suriname?
988 An, with China, Taiwan Province of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Taiwan Province of and Suriname?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China, Taiwan Province of and Suriname rank globally for buffalo — stocks?
China, Taiwan Province of ranks 35th and Suriname ranks 36th of 60 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Buffalo — Stocks. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Taiwan Province of vs Suriname: Buffalo — Stocks. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/buffalo-stocks-2/china-taiwan-province-of/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/buffalo-stocks-2/china-taiwan-province-of/suriname/">China, Taiwan Province of vs Suriname: Buffalo — Stocks</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Buffalo — Stocks
Unit
An
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
97 places, 4,384 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).