China vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Buffalo — Stocks

China
31.53 million An
in 2023
Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
8.68 million An
in 2023
China rank
3rd
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank
2nd

Buffalo — Stocks over time

  • China
  • Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
010.0M20.0M30.0M196119922023

How they compare

China currently reports 31.53 million An against 8.68 million An in Least Developed Countries (LDCs), a difference of 22.84 million An.

That makes China's figure about 3.6 times Least Developed Countries (LDCs)'s.

Across all 63 years both countries report, China has been ahead every year.

China ranks 3rd and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 2nd of 60 countries.

China has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Least Developed Countries (LDCs) Difference Ahead
1960s 11.84 million An 4.14 million An 7.70 million An China
1970s 17.27 million An 5.25 million An 12.02 million An China
1980s 19.66 million An 6.95 million An 12.70 million An China
1990s 22.09 million An 8.21 million An 13.88 million An China
2000s 23.40 million An 9.72 million An 13.68 million An China
2010s 27.42 million An 11.67 million An 15.75 million An China
2020s 30.08 million An 10.23 million An 19.85 million An China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher buffalo — stocks, China or Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
China, at 31.53 million An against 8.68 million An in Least Developed Countries (LDCs) as of 2023.
What is the difference in buffalo — stocks between China and Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
22.84 million An, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank globally for buffalo — stocks?
China ranks 3rd and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 2nd of 60 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Buffalo — Stocks. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Buffalo — Stocks. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/buffalo-stocks-2/china/least-developed-countries-ldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/buffalo-stocks-2/china/least-developed-countries-ldcs/">China vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Buffalo — Stocks</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Buffalo — Stocks
Unit
An
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
97 places, 4,384 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).