Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Myanmar: Buffalo — Stocks

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
3.10 million An
in 2023
Myanmar
2.08 million An
in 2023
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
8th
Myanmar rank
7th

Buffalo — Stocks over time

  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
  • Myanmar
1.0M2.0M3.0M4.0M5.0M196119922023

How they compare

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 3.10 million An against 2.08 million An in Myanmar, a difference of 1.03 million An.

That makes Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s figure about 1.5 times Myanmar's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Myanmar ahead.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 8th and Myanmar ranks 7th of 26 groups.

Across the 7 decades both report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) averaged higher in 5 and Myanmar in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Myanmar Difference Ahead
1960s 905,544 An 1.24 million An 331,298 An Myanmar
1970s 1.60 million An 1.69 million An 86,410 An Myanmar
1980s 2.74 million An 2.08 million An 658,483 An Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
1990s 3.23 million An 2.20 million An 1.03 million An Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2000s 4.07 million An 2.69 million An 1.38 million An Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2010s 5.17 million An 3.09 million An 2.08 million An Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2020s 4.68 million An 2.04 million An 2.64 million An Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher buffalo — stocks, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or Myanmar?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 3.10 million An against 2.08 million An in Myanmar as of 2023.
What is the difference in buffalo — stocks between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Myanmar?
1.03 million An, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Myanmar?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Myanmar rank globally for buffalo — stocks?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 8th and Myanmar ranks 7th of 26 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Buffalo — Stocks. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Myanmar: Buffalo — Stocks. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/buffalo-stocks-2/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/myanmar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/buffalo-stocks-2/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/myanmar/">Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Myanmar: Buffalo — Stocks</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Buffalo — Stocks
Unit
An
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
97 places, 4,384 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).