Sri Lanka vs USSR: Buffalo — Stocks
Buffalo — Stocks over time
- Sri Lanka
- USSR
How they compare
USSR currently reports 415,000 An against 327,010 An in Sri Lanka, a difference of 87,990 An.
That makes USSR's figure about 1.3 times Sri Lanka's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Sri Lanka has been ahead every year.
Sri Lanka ranks 20th and USSR ranks 19th of 69 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sri Lanka | USSR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 846,874 An | 414,489 An | 432,385 An | Sri Lanka |
| 1970s | 778,680 An | 419,570 An | 359,110 An | Sri Lanka |
| 1980s | 935,029 An | 362,000 An | 573,029 An | Sri Lanka |
| 1990s | 891,550 An | 417,500 An | 474,050 An | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher buffalo — stocks, Sri Lanka or USSR?
- USSR, at 415,000 An against 327,010 An in Sri Lanka as of 1991.
- What is the difference in buffalo — stocks between Sri Lanka and USSR?
- 87,990 An, with USSR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and USSR?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
- How do Sri Lanka and USSR rank globally for buffalo — stocks?
- Sri Lanka ranks 20th and USSR ranks 19th of 69 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Buffalo — Stocks. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).