China, Hong Kong SAR vs Singapore: Buffalo — Stocks

China, Hong Kong SAR
234.5 LSU
in 2023
Singapore
14 LSU
in 1991
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
39th
Singapore rank
41st

Buffalo — Stocks over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Singapore
05001.0k1.5k2.0k2.5k196119922023

How they compare

China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports 234.5 LSU against 14 LSU in Singapore, a difference of 220.5 LSU.

That makes China, Hong Kong SAR's figure about 16.8 times Singapore's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Singapore ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 39th and Singapore ranks 41st of 60 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 1 and Singapore in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Singapore Difference Ahead
1960s 1,027 LSU 2,220 LSU 1,193 LSU Singapore
1970s 590.73 LSU 1,386 LSU 795.27 LSU Singapore
1980s 67.9 LSU 171.5 LSU 103.6 LSU Singapore
1990s 105 LSU 17.5 LSU 87.5 LSU China, Hong Kong SAR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher buffalo — stocks, China, Hong Kong SAR or Singapore?
China, Hong Kong SAR, at 234.5 LSU against 14 LSU in Singapore as of 2023.
What is the difference in buffalo — stocks between China, Hong Kong SAR and Singapore?
220.5 LSU, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Singapore?
31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Singapore rank globally for buffalo — stocks?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 39th and Singapore ranks 41st of 60 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Buffalo — Stocks. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Singapore: Buffalo — Stocks. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/buffalo-stocks/china-hong-kong-sar/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/buffalo-stocks/china-hong-kong-sar/singapore/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Singapore: Buffalo — Stocks</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Buffalo — Stocks
Unit
LSU
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
95 places, 4,258 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Patterns domain of FAOSTAT contains data on livestock numbers, shares of major livestock species and densities of livestock units in the agricultural land area. Values are calculated using Livestock Units (LSU), which facilitate aggregating information for different livestock types. Data are available by country, with global coverage, for the period 1961 to the most recent year available with annual updates. This methodology applies the LSU coefficients reported in the "Guidelines for the preparation of livestock sector reviews" (FAO, 2011). From this publication, LSU coefficients are computed by livestock type and by country. The reference unit used for the calculation of livestock units (=1 LSU) is the grazing equivalent of one adult dairy cow producing 3000 kg of milk annually, fed without additional concentrated foodstuffs. FAOSTAT agri-environmental indicators on livestock patterns closely follow the structure of the indicators in EUROSTAT.