Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Lao People's Democratic Republic: Buffalo — Stocks

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2.51 million LSU
in 2023
Lao People's Democratic Republic
848,364 LSU
in 2023
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
8th
Lao People's Democratic Republic rank
10th

Buffalo — Stocks over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
  • Lao People's Democratic Republic
01.0M2.0M3.0M4.0M196119922023

How they compare

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 2.51 million LSU against 848,364 LSU in Lao People's Democratic Republic, a difference of 1.66 million LSU.

That makes Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 3.0 times Lao People's Democratic Republic's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has been ahead every year.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 8th and Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 10th of 26 groups.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Lao People's Democratic Republic Difference Ahead
1960s 906,999 LSU 453,402 LSU 453,597 LSU Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
1970s 1.29 million LSU 489,815 LSU 802,915 LSU Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
1980s 2.03 million LSU 665,407 LSU 1.37 million LSU Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
1990s 2.58 million LSU 793,212 LSU 1.79 million LSU Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2000s 3.04 million LSU 774,466 LSU 2.27 million LSU Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2010s 3.61 million LSU 830,903 LSU 2.78 million LSU Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2020s 3.32 million LSU 856,806 LSU 2.46 million LSU Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher buffalo — stocks, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or Lao People's Democratic Republic?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 2.51 million LSU against 848,364 LSU in Lao People's Democratic Republic as of 2023.
What is the difference in buffalo — stocks between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Lao People's Democratic Republic?
1.66 million LSU, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Lao People's Democratic Republic?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Lao People's Democratic Republic rank globally for buffalo — stocks?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 8th and Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 10th of 26 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Buffalo — Stocks. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Buffalo — Stocks
Unit
LSU
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
95 places, 4,258 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Patterns domain of FAOSTAT contains data on livestock numbers, shares of major livestock species and densities of livestock units in the agricultural land area. Values are calculated using Livestock Units (LSU), which facilitate aggregating information for different livestock types. Data are available by country, with global coverage, for the period 1961 to the most recent year available with annual updates. This methodology applies the LSU coefficients reported in the "Guidelines for the preparation of livestock sector reviews" (FAO, 2011). From this publication, LSU coefficients are computed by livestock type and by country. The reference unit used for the calculation of livestock units (=1 LSU) is the grazing equivalent of one adult dairy cow producing 3000 kg of milk annually, fed without additional concentrated foodstuffs. FAOSTAT agri-environmental indicators on livestock patterns closely follow the structure of the indicators in EUROSTAT.