Least Developed Countries (LDCs) vs Pakistan: Buffalo — Stocks

Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
5.16 million LSU
in 2023
Pakistan
22.49 million LSU
in 2023
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank
2nd
Pakistan rank
2nd

Buffalo — Stocks over time

  • Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
  • Pakistan
05.0M10.0M15.0M20.0M196119922023

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 22.49 million LSU against 5.16 million LSU in Least Developed Countries (LDCs), a difference of 17.33 million LSU.

That makes Pakistan's figure about 4.4 times Least Developed Countries (LDCs)'s.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Pakistan has been ahead every year.

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 2nd and Pakistan ranks 2nd of 11 groups.

Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Least Developed Countries (LDCs) Pakistan Difference Ahead
1960s 2.59 million LSU 3.95 million LSU 1.36 million LSU Pakistan
1970s 3.25 million LSU 5.15 million LSU 1.90 million LSU Pakistan
1980s 4.20 million LSU 6.96 million LSU 2.76 million LSU Pakistan
1990s 4.94 million LSU 9.78 million LSU 4.85 million LSU Pakistan
2000s 5.78 million LSU 13.05 million LSU 7.27 million LSU Pakistan
2010s 6.85 million LSU 17.53 million LSU 10.68 million LSU Pakistan
2020s 5.93 million LSU 21.53 million LSU 15.61 million LSU Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher buffalo — stocks, Least Developed Countries (LDCs) or Pakistan?
Pakistan, at 22.49 million LSU against 5.16 million LSU in Least Developed Countries (LDCs) as of 2023.
What is the difference in buffalo — stocks between Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Pakistan?
17.33 million LSU, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Pakistan?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Pakistan rank globally for buffalo — stocks?
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 2nd and Pakistan ranks 2nd of 11 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Buffalo — Stocks. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) vs Pakistan: Buffalo — Stocks. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/buffalo-stocks/least-developed-countries-ldcs/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/buffalo-stocks/least-developed-countries-ldcs/pakistan/">Least Developed Countries (LDCs) vs Pakistan: Buffalo — Stocks</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Buffalo — Stocks
Unit
LSU
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
95 places, 4,258 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Patterns domain of FAOSTAT contains data on livestock numbers, shares of major livestock species and densities of livestock units in the agricultural land area. Values are calculated using Livestock Units (LSU), which facilitate aggregating information for different livestock types. Data are available by country, with global coverage, for the period 1961 to the most recent year available with annual updates. This methodology applies the LSU coefficients reported in the "Guidelines for the preparation of livestock sector reviews" (FAO, 2011). From this publication, LSU coefficients are computed by livestock type and by country. The reference unit used for the calculation of livestock units (=1 LSU) is the grazing equivalent of one adult dairy cow producing 3000 kg of milk annually, fed without additional concentrated foodstuffs. FAOSTAT agri-environmental indicators on livestock patterns closely follow the structure of the indicators in EUROSTAT.