Azerbaijan vs Namibia: Camels and Llamas — Stocks
Camels and Llamas — Stocks over time
- Azerbaijan
- Namibia
How they compare
Azerbaijan currently reports 361 An against 96 An in Namibia, a difference of 265 An.
That makes Azerbaijan's figure about 3.8 times Namibia's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Azerbaijan has been ahead every year.
Azerbaijan ranks 49th and Namibia ranks 52nd of 53 countries.
Azerbaijan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 176.5 An | 72.4 An | 104.1 An | Azerbaijan |
| 2010s | 244.9 An | 89.5 An | 155.4 An | Azerbaijan |
| 2020s | 314.75 An | 95 An | 219.75 An | Azerbaijan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher camels and llamas — stocks, Azerbaijan or Namibia?
- Azerbaijan, at 361 An against 96 An in Namibia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in camels and llamas — stocks between Azerbaijan and Namibia?
- 265 An, with Azerbaijan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Namibia?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Azerbaijan and Namibia rank globally for camels and llamas — stocks?
- Azerbaijan ranks 49th and Namibia ranks 52nd of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Camels and Llamas — Stocks. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).