Libya vs Uzbekistan: Camels and Llamas — Stocks
Camels and Llamas — Stocks over time
- Libya
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Libya currently reports 62,852 An against 18,427 An in Uzbekistan, a difference of 44,425 An.
That makes Libya's figure about 3.4 times Uzbekistan's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Libya has been ahead every year.
Libya ranks 36th and Uzbekistan ranks 39th of 53 countries.
Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 86,000 An | 21,188 An | 64,812 An | Libya |
| 2000s | 49,000 An | 16,220 An | 32,780 An | Libya |
| 2010s | 58,524 An | 18,464 An | 40,060 An | Libya |
| 2020s | 61,601 An | 19,734 An | 41,867 An | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher camels and llamas — stocks, Libya or Uzbekistan?
- Libya, at 62,852 An against 18,427 An in Uzbekistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in camels and llamas — stocks between Libya and Uzbekistan?
- 44,425 An, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Uzbekistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Libya and Uzbekistan rank globally for camels and llamas — stocks?
- Libya ranks 36th and Uzbekistan ranks 39th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Camels and Llamas — Stocks. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).