Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Türkiye: Camels and Llamas — Stocks

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
34.96 million An
in 2023
Türkiye
1,197 An
in 2023
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
5th
Türkiye rank
7th

Camels and Llamas — Stocks over time

  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
  • Türkiye
010.0M20.0M30.0M196119922023

How they compare

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 34.96 million An against 1,197 An in Türkiye, a difference of 34.96 million An.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has been ahead every year.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 5th and Türkiye ranks 7th of 21 groups.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Türkiye Difference Ahead
1960s 9.84 million An 49,239 An 9.79 million An Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
1970s 12.44 million An 22,700 An 12.42 million An Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
1980s 14.55 million An 6,600 An 14.54 million An Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
1990s 15.72 million An 1,880 An 15.72 million An Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2000s 21.00 million An 967.5 An 21.00 million An Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2010s 28.06 million An 1,422 An 28.06 million An Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2020s 33.78 million An 1,222 An 33.78 million An Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher camels and llamas — stocks, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or Türkiye?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 34.96 million An against 1,197 An in Türkiye as of 2023.
What is the difference in camels and llamas — stocks between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Türkiye?
34.96 million An, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Türkiye?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Türkiye rank globally for camels and llamas — stocks?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 5th and Türkiye ranks 7th of 21 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Camels and Llamas — Stocks. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Türkiye: Camels and Llamas — Stocks. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/camels-and-llamas-stocks/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/turkiye-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/camels-and-llamas-stocks/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/turkiye-2/">Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Türkiye: Camels and Llamas — Stocks</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Camels and Llamas — Stocks
Unit
An
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
77 places, 4,293 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).