Mauritania, Islamic Republic of vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Camels β€” Stocks

Mauritania, Islamic Republic of
1.54 million An
in 2023
Sub-Saharan Africa
29.86 million An
in 2023
Mauritania, Islamic Republic of rank
9th
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
3rd

Camels β€” Stocks over time

  • Mauritania, Islamic Republic of
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
010.0M20.0M30.0M196119922023

How they compare

Sub-Saharan Africa currently reports 29.86 million An against 1.54 million An in Mauritania, Islamic Republic of, a difference of 28.33 million An.

That makes Sub-Saharan Africa's figure about 19.4 times Mauritania, Islamic Republic of's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Sub-Saharan Africa has been ahead every year.

Mauritania, Islamic Republic of ranks 9th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 3rd of 48 countries.

Sub-Saharan Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritania, Islamic Republic of Sub-Saharan Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 628,889 An 7.14 million An 6.51 million An Sub-Saharan Africa
1970s 709,100 An 9.42 million An 8.71 million An Sub-Saharan Africa
1980s 800,320 An 11.46 million An 10.66 million An Sub-Saharan Africa
1990s 1.11 million An 12.45 million An 11.34 million An Sub-Saharan Africa
2000s 1.46 million An 16.87 million An 15.42 million An Sub-Saharan Africa
2010s 1.44 million An 22.94 million An 21.50 million An Sub-Saharan Africa
2020s 1.54 million An 28.65 million An 27.10 million An Sub-Saharan Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher camels β€” stocks, Mauritania, Islamic Republic of or Sub-Saharan Africa?
Sub-Saharan Africa, at 29.86 million An against 1.54 million An in Mauritania, Islamic Republic of as of 2023.
What is the difference in camels β€” stocks between Mauritania, Islamic Republic of and Sub-Saharan Africa?
28.33 million An, with Sub-Saharan Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania, Islamic Republic of and Sub-Saharan Africa?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mauritania, Islamic Republic of and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for camels β€” stocks?
Mauritania, Islamic Republic of ranks 9th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 3rd of 48 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Camels β€” Stocks. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritania, Islamic Republic of vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Camels β€” Stocks. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/camels-stocks-2/mauritania/sub-saharan-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/camels-stocks-2/mauritania/sub-saharan-africa/">Mauritania, Islamic Republic of vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Camels β€” Stocks</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Camels β€” Stocks
Unit
An
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
72 places, 3,978 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).