East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs South Sudan: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), annual growth rate

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
1.36 % change on previous year
in 2024
South Sudan
10 % change on previous year
in 2024
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank
26th
South Sudan rank
28th

Capture fisheries production (metric tons), annual growth rate over time

  • East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
  • South Sudan
-50510196119922024

How they compare

South Sudan currently reports 10 % change on previous year against 1.36 % change on previous year in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), a difference of 8.64 % change on previous year.

That makes South Sudan's figure about 7.4 times East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)'s.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2013 it was East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ahead.

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 26th and South Sudan ranks 28th of 47 groups.

South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) South Sudan Difference Ahead
2010s 0.3935 % change on previous year 2.88 % change on previous year 2.48 % change on previous year South Sudan
2020s -0.4064 % change on previous year 4.21 % change on previous year 4.61 % change on previous year South Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fisheries production (metric tons), annual growth rate, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) or South Sudan?
South Sudan, at 10 % change on previous year against 1.36 % change on previous year in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) as of 2024.
What is the difference in capture fisheries production (metric tons), annual growth rate between East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and South Sudan?
8.64 % change on previous year, with South Sudan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and South Sudan?
12 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2024.
How do East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and South Sudan rank globally for capture fisheries production (metric tons), annual growth rate?
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 26th and South Sudan ranks 28th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fisheries production (metric tons), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs South Sudan: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-annual-growth-rate/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/south-sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-annual-growth-rate/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/south-sudan/">East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs South Sudan: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fisheries production (metric tons), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
260 places, 15,342 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Capture fisheries production (metric tons). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.