Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) vs Lithuania: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per capita

Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
0.0031 metric tons per person
in 2024
Lithuania
0.0268 metric tons per person
in 2024
Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) rank
47th
Lithuania rank
50th

Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per capita over time

  • Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
  • Lithuania
00.020.040.06196019922024

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports 0.0268 metric tons per person against 0.0031 metric tons per person in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income), a difference of 0.0237 metric tons per person.

That makes Lithuania's figure about 8.6 times Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)'s.

Across all 33 years both countries report, Lithuania has been ahead every year.

Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) ranks 47th and Lithuania ranks 50th of 47 groups.

Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) Lithuania Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0047 metric tons per person 0.0235 metric tons per person 0.0189 metric tons per person Lithuania
2000s 0.004 metric tons per person 0.0463 metric tons per person 0.0423 metric tons per person Lithuania
2010s 0.0032 metric tons per person 0.0359 metric tons per person 0.0328 metric tons per person Lithuania
2020s 0.0032 metric tons per person 0.0334 metric tons per person 0.0302 metric tons per person Lithuania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fisheries production (metric tons), per capita, Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) or Lithuania?
Lithuania, at 0.0268 metric tons per person against 0.0031 metric tons per person in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) as of 2024.
What is the difference in capture fisheries production (metric tons), per capita between Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) and Lithuania?
0.0237 metric tons per person, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) and Lithuania?
33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
How do Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) and Lithuania rank globally for capture fisheries production (metric tons), per capita?
Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) ranks 47th and Lithuania ranks 50th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) vs Lithuania: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-capita/europe-and-central-asia-excluding-high-income/lithuania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-capita/europe-and-central-asia-excluding-high-income/lithuania/">Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) vs Lithuania: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per capita
Unit
metric tons per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 16,000 data points, 1960–2024
Last refreshed

Capture fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.