Suriname vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per capita

Suriname
0.0507 metric tons per person
in 2024
Turks and Caicos Islands
0.0496 metric tons per person
in 2024
Suriname rank
24th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
25th

Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per capita over time

  • Suriname
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
00.20.40.6196019922024

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 0.0507 metric tons per person against 0.0496 metric tons per person in Turks and Caicos Islands, a difference of 0.0011 metric tons per person.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.

Suriname ranks 24th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 25th of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Suriname averaged higher in 1 and Turks and Caicos Islands in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Suriname Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0208 metric tons per person 0.2398 metric tons per person 0.2189 metric tons per person Turks and Caicos Islands
1970s 0.0232 metric tons per person 0.3815 metric tons per person 0.3583 metric tons per person Turks and Caicos Islands
1980s 0.013 metric tons per person 0.3929 metric tons per person 0.3799 metric tons per person Turks and Caicos Islands
1990s 0.0329 metric tons per person 0.296 metric tons per person 0.2631 metric tons per person Turks and Caicos Islands
2000s 0.0575 metric tons per person 0.2505 metric tons per person 0.1931 metric tons per person Turks and Caicos Islands
2010s 0.0652 metric tons per person 0.0698 metric tons per person 0.0046 metric tons per person Turks and Caicos Islands
2020s 0.0512 metric tons per person 0.0502 metric tons per person 0.001 metric tons per person Suriname

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fisheries production (metric tons), per capita, Suriname or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Suriname, at 0.0507 metric tons per person against 0.0496 metric tons per person in Turks and Caicos Islands as of 2024.
What is the difference in capture fisheries production (metric tons), per capita between Suriname and Turks and Caicos Islands?
0.0011 metric tons per person, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Suriname and Turks and Caicos Islands?
65 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2024.
How do Suriname and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for capture fisheries production (metric tons), per capita?
Suriname ranks 24th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 25th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Suriname vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-capita/suriname/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-capita/suriname/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Suriname vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per capita
Unit
metric tons per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 16,000 data points, 1960–2024
Last refreshed

Capture fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.