Afghanistan vs Lesotho: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Afghanistan
0.0031 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Lesotho
0.0024 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Afghanistan rank
205th
Lesotho rank
207th

Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Afghanistan
  • Lesotho
00.0010.0020.003196119922023

How they compare

Afghanistan currently reports 0.0031 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0024 metric tons per square kilometre in Lesotho, a difference of 0.0007 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Afghanistan's figure about 1.3 times Lesotho's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Afghanistan ahead.

Afghanistan ranks 205th and Lesotho ranks 207th of 216 countries.

Afghanistan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Afghanistan Lesotho Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0005 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0005 metric tons per square kilometre Afghanistan
1970s 0.0008 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0008 metric tons per square kilometre Afghanistan
1980s 0.0013 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0013 metric tons per square kilometre Afghanistan
1990s 0.0019 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0007 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0011 metric tons per square kilometre Afghanistan
2000s 0.0015 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0014 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0001 metric tons per square kilometre Afghanistan
2010s 0.0025 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0017 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0008 metric tons per square kilometre Afghanistan
2020s 0.003 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0024 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0006 metric tons per square kilometre Afghanistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Afghanistan or Lesotho?
Afghanistan, at 0.0031 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0024 metric tons per square kilometre in Lesotho as of 2023.
What is the difference in capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Afghanistan and Lesotho?
0.0007 metric tons per square kilometre, with Afghanistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Lesotho?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Afghanistan and Lesotho rank globally for capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Afghanistan ranks 205th and Lesotho ranks 207th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Afghanistan vs Lesotho: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/afghanistan/lesotho/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/afghanistan/lesotho/">Afghanistan vs Lesotho: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Capture fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.