Angola vs South Africa: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Angola
0.4434 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
South Africa
0.4316 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Angola rank
122nd
South Africa rank
125th

Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Angola
  • South Africa
00.511.52196119922023

How they compare

Angola currently reports 0.4434 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.4316 metric tons per square kilometre in South Africa, a difference of 0.0118 metric tons per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was South Africa ahead.

Angola ranks 122nd and South Africa ranks 125th of 216 countries.

South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola South Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2455 metric tons per square kilometre 1.23 metric tons per square kilometre 0.9882 metric tons per square kilometre South Africa
1970s 0.2234 metric tons per square kilometre 1.07 metric tons per square kilometre 0.8514 metric tons per square kilometre South Africa
1980s 0.0873 metric tons per square kilometre 0.8245 metric tons per square kilometre 0.7371 metric tons per square kilometre South Africa
1990s 0.1098 metric tons per square kilometre 0.4718 metric tons per square kilometre 0.362 metric tons per square kilometre South Africa
2000s 0.2017 metric tons per square kilometre 0.63 metric tons per square kilometre 0.4284 metric tons per square kilometre South Africa
2010s 0.3395 metric tons per square kilometre 0.5206 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1811 metric tons per square kilometre South Africa
2020s 0.4082 metric tons per square kilometre 0.4902 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0821 metric tons per square kilometre South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Angola or South Africa?
Angola, at 0.4434 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.4316 metric tons per square kilometre in South Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Angola and South Africa?
0.0118 metric tons per square kilometre, with Angola ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and South Africa?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Angola and South Africa rank globally for capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Angola ranks 122nd and South Africa ranks 125th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs South Africa: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/angola/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/angola/south-africa/">Angola vs South Africa: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Capture fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.