Angola vs East Timor: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Angola
0.4434 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
East Timor
0.4366 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Angola rank
122nd
East Timor rank
123rd

Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Angola
  • East Timor
00.10.20.30.40.5196119922023

How they compare

Angola currently reports 0.4434 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.4366 metric tons per square kilometre in East Timor, a difference of 0.0068 metric tons per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Angola ahead.

Angola ranks 122nd and East Timor ranks 123rd of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 5 and East Timor in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola East Timor Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2455 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2455 metric tons per square kilometre Angola
1970s 0.2234 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2234 metric tons per square kilometre Angola
1980s 0.0873 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0873 metric tons per square kilometre Angola
1990s 0.1098 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0229 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0869 metric tons per square kilometre Angola
2000s 0.2017 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2357 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0341 metric tons per square kilometre East Timor
2010s 0.3395 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2988 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0407 metric tons per square kilometre Angola
2020s 0.4082 metric tons per square kilometre 0.4389 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0307 metric tons per square kilometre East Timor

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Angola or East Timor?
Angola, at 0.4434 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.4366 metric tons per square kilometre in East Timor as of 2023.
What is the difference in capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Angola and East Timor?
0.0068 metric tons per square kilometre, with Angola ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and East Timor?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Angola and East Timor rank globally for capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Angola ranks 122nd and East Timor ranks 123rd of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs East Timor: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/angola/timor-leste/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/angola/timor-leste/">Angola vs East Timor: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Capture fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.