Argentina vs Liberia: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Argentina
0.3177 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Liberia
0.2931 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Argentina rank
136th
Liberia rank
137th

Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Argentina
  • Liberia
00.10.20.30.40.5196119922023

How they compare

Argentina currently reports 0.3177 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.2931 metric tons per square kilometre in Liberia, a difference of 0.0246 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Argentina's figure about 1.1 times Liberia's.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Liberia ahead.

Argentina ranks 136th and Liberia ranks 137th of 216 countries.

Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Liberia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.066 metric tons per square kilometre 0.051 metric tons per square kilometre 0.015 metric tons per square kilometre Argentina
1970s 0.1212 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1029 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0183 metric tons per square kilometre Argentina
1980s 0.1574 metric tons per square kilometre 0.151 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0064 metric tons per square kilometre Argentina
1990s 0.3669 metric tons per square kilometre 0.094 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2729 metric tons per square kilometre Argentina
2000s 0.352 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1156 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2364 metric tons per square kilometre Argentina
2010s 0.3029 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1439 metric tons per square kilometre 0.159 metric tons per square kilometre Argentina
2020s 0.3201 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2969 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0232 metric tons per square kilometre Argentina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Argentina or Liberia?
Argentina, at 0.3177 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.2931 metric tons per square kilometre in Liberia as of 2023.
What is the difference in capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Argentina and Liberia?
0.0246 metric tons per square kilometre, with Argentina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Liberia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Argentina and Liberia rank globally for capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Argentina ranks 136th and Liberia ranks 137th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Liberia: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/argentina/liberia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/argentina/liberia/">Argentina vs Liberia: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Capture fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.