Aruba vs Greenland: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Aruba
0.9444 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Greenland
0.9679 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Aruba rank
92nd
Greenland rank
90th
Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time
- Aruba
- Greenland
How they compare
Greenland currently reports 0.9679 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.9444 metric tons per square kilometre in Aruba, a difference of 0.0235 metric tons per square kilometre.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Aruba ahead.
Aruba ranks 92nd and Greenland ranks 90th of 216 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 4 and Greenland in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Greenland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.79 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.1644 metric tons per square kilometre | 1.63 metric tons per square kilometre | Aruba |
| 1970s | 3.19 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.4226 metric tons per square kilometre | 2.77 metric tons per square kilometre | Aruba |
| 1980s | 3.87 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.5381 metric tons per square kilometre | 3.33 metric tons per square kilometre | Aruba |
| 1990s | 1.36 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.713 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.6492 metric tons per square kilometre | Aruba |
| 2000s | 0.8839 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.9243 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.0405 metric tons per square kilometre | Greenland |
| 2010s | 0.8417 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.9449 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.1032 metric tons per square kilometre | Greenland |
| 2020s | 0.9264 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.9284 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.002 metric tons per square kilometre | Greenland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Aruba or Greenland?
- Greenland, at 0.9679 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.9444 metric tons per square kilometre in Aruba as of 2023.
- What is the difference in capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Aruba and Greenland?
- 0.0235 metric tons per square kilometre, with Greenland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Greenland?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Aruba and Greenland rank globally for capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
- Aruba ranks 92nd and Greenland ranks 90th of 216 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Capture fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.