Austria vs Eswatini: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Austria
0.0042 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini
0.0038 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Austria rank
203rd
Eswatini rank
204th

Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Austria
  • Eswatini
00.020.040.06196119922023

How they compare

Austria currently reports 0.0042 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0038 metric tons per square kilometre in Eswatini, a difference of 0.0004 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Austria's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.

Across all 56 years both countries report, Austria has been ahead every year.

Austria ranks 203rd and Eswatini ranks 204th of 216 countries.

Austria has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Austria Eswatini Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0361 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0029 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0332 metric tons per square kilometre Austria
1970s 0.0142 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0029 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0113 metric tons per square kilometre Austria
1980s 0.0104 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0046 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0059 metric tons per square kilometre Austria
1990s 0.0055 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0033 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0022 metric tons per square kilometre Austria
2000s 0.0045 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0034 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0011 metric tons per square kilometre Austria
2010s 0.0042 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0037 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0005 metric tons per square kilometre Austria
2020s 0.0042 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0037 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0005 metric tons per square kilometre Austria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Austria or Eswatini?
Austria, at 0.0042 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0038 metric tons per square kilometre in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Austria and Eswatini?
0.0004 metric tons per square kilometre, with Austria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Eswatini?
56 years are reported by both, from 1968 to 2023.
How do Austria and Eswatini rank globally for capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Austria ranks 203rd and Eswatini ranks 204th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Austria vs Eswatini: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/austria/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/austria/eswatini/">Austria vs Eswatini: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Capture fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.