Bangladesh vs Euro area: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Bangladesh
15.87 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Euro area
0.9636 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Bangladesh rank
13th
Euro area rank
11th

Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Euro area
051015196119922023

How they compare

Bangladesh currently reports 15.87 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.9636 metric tons per square kilometre in Euro area, a difference of 14.91 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Bangladesh's figure about 16.5 times Euro area's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Bangladesh has been ahead every year.

Bangladesh ranks 13th and Euro area ranks 11th of 216 countries.

Bangladesh has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Euro area Difference Ahead
1960s 3.93 metric tons per square kilometre 1.66 metric tons per square kilometre 2.27 metric tons per square kilometre Bangladesh
1970s 4.89 metric tons per square kilometre 1.71 metric tons per square kilometre 3.18 metric tons per square kilometre Bangladesh
1980s 4.76 metric tons per square kilometre 1.65 metric tons per square kilometre 3.1 metric tons per square kilometre Bangladesh
1990s 6.01 metric tons per square kilometre 1.52 metric tons per square kilometre 4.49 metric tons per square kilometre Bangladesh
2000s 10.1 metric tons per square kilometre 1.35 metric tons per square kilometre 8.75 metric tons per square kilometre Bangladesh
2010s 12.96 metric tons per square kilometre 1.21 metric tons per square kilometre 11.75 metric tons per square kilometre Bangladesh
2020s 15.35 metric tons per square kilometre 1 metric tons per square kilometre 14.35 metric tons per square kilometre Bangladesh

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Bangladesh or Euro area?
Bangladesh, at 15.87 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.9636 metric tons per square kilometre in Euro area as of 2023.
What is the difference in capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Bangladesh and Euro area?
14.91 metric tons per square kilometre, with Bangladesh ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Euro area?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Bangladesh and Euro area rank globally for capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Bangladesh ranks 13th and Euro area ranks 11th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Euro area: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/euro-area/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/euro-area/">Bangladesh vs Euro area: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Capture fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.