Bangladesh vs Mauritius: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Bangladesh
15.87 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius
17.93 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Bangladesh rank
13th
Mauritius rank
12th

Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Mauritius
05101520196119922023

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 17.93 metric tons per square kilometre against 15.87 metric tons per square kilometre in Bangladesh, a difference of 2.06 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.1 times Bangladesh's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Bangladesh ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 13th and Mauritius ranks 12th of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 4 and Mauritius in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Mauritius Difference Ahead
1960s 3.93 metric tons per square kilometre 1.49 metric tons per square kilometre 2.44 metric tons per square kilometre Bangladesh
1970s 4.89 metric tons per square kilometre 3.26 metric tons per square kilometre 1.63 metric tons per square kilometre Bangladesh
1980s 4.76 metric tons per square kilometre 5.88 metric tons per square kilometre 1.12 metric tons per square kilometre Mauritius
1990s 6.01 metric tons per square kilometre 7.73 metric tons per square kilometre 1.72 metric tons per square kilometre Mauritius
2000s 10.1 metric tons per square kilometre 4.67 metric tons per square kilometre 5.43 metric tons per square kilometre Bangladesh
2010s 12.96 metric tons per square kilometre 8.33 metric tons per square kilometre 4.64 metric tons per square kilometre Bangladesh
2020s 15.35 metric tons per square kilometre 15.71 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3577 metric tons per square kilometre Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Bangladesh or Mauritius?
Mauritius, at 17.93 metric tons per square kilometre against 15.87 metric tons per square kilometre in Bangladesh as of 2023.
What is the difference in capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Bangladesh and Mauritius?
2.06 metric tons per square kilometre, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Mauritius?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Bangladesh and Mauritius rank globally for capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Bangladesh ranks 13th and Mauritius ranks 12th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Mauritius: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/mauritius/">Bangladesh vs Mauritius: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Capture fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.