Belize vs OECD members: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Belize
8.67 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
OECD members
0.6755 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Belize rank
20th
OECD members rank
21st

Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Belize
  • OECD members
05101520196119922023

How they compare

Belize currently reports 8.67 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.6755 metric tons per square kilometre in OECD members, a difference of 7.99 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Belize's figure about 12.8 times OECD members's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was OECD members ahead.

Belize ranks 20th and OECD members ranks 21st of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Belize averaged higher in 3 and OECD members in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belize OECD members Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0443 metric tons per square kilometre 0.6611 metric tons per square kilometre 0.6168 metric tons per square kilometre OECD members
1970s 0.088 metric tons per square kilometre 0.853 metric tons per square kilometre 0.765 metric tons per square kilometre OECD members
1980s 0.0972 metric tons per square kilometre 1.08 metric tons per square kilometre 0.9856 metric tons per square kilometre OECD members
1990s 0.63 metric tons per square kilometre 1.05 metric tons per square kilometre 0.418 metric tons per square kilometre OECD members
2000s 6.66 metric tons per square kilometre 0.8723 metric tons per square kilometre 5.79 metric tons per square kilometre Belize
2010s 7.44 metric tons per square kilometre 0.7365 metric tons per square kilometre 6.71 metric tons per square kilometre Belize
2020s 8.5 metric tons per square kilometre 0.6714 metric tons per square kilometre 7.83 metric tons per square kilometre Belize

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Belize or OECD members?
Belize, at 8.67 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.6755 metric tons per square kilometre in OECD members as of 2023.
What is the difference in capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Belize and OECD members?
7.99 metric tons per square kilometre, with Belize ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and OECD members?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Belize and OECD members rank globally for capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Belize ranks 20th and OECD members ranks 21st of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belize vs OECD members: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/belize/oecd-members/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/belize/oecd-members/">Belize vs OECD members: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Capture fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.