Bhutan vs Lesotho: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Bhutan
0.0001 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Lesotho
0.0024 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Bhutan rank
210th
Lesotho rank
207th

Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Bhutan
  • Lesotho
00.0010.0020.003196119922023

How they compare

Lesotho currently reports 0.0024 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0001 metric tons per square kilometre in Bhutan, a difference of 0.0023 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Lesotho's figure about 18.6 times Bhutan's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Bhutan ahead.

Bhutan ranks 210th and Lesotho ranks 207th of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 4 and Lesotho in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Lesotho Difference Ahead
1960s 0.003 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.003 metric tons per square kilometre Bhutan
1970s 0.0032 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0032 metric tons per square kilometre Bhutan
1980s 0.0027 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0027 metric tons per square kilometre Bhutan
1990s 0.0018 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0007 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0011 metric tons per square kilometre Bhutan
2000s 0.0007 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0014 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0007 metric tons per square kilometre Lesotho
2010s 0.0001 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0017 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0015 metric tons per square kilometre Lesotho
2020s 0.0001 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0024 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0023 metric tons per square kilometre Lesotho

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Bhutan or Lesotho?
Lesotho, at 0.0024 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0001 metric tons per square kilometre in Bhutan as of 2023.
What is the difference in capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Bhutan and Lesotho?
0.0023 metric tons per square kilometre, with Lesotho ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Lesotho?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Bhutan and Lesotho rank globally for capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Bhutan ranks 210th and Lesotho ranks 207th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs Lesotho: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/lesotho/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/lesotho/">Bhutan vs Lesotho: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Capture fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.