Bolivia vs Jordan: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Bolivia
0.0146 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Jordan
0.0075 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Bolivia rank
198th
Jordan rank
201st

Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Bolivia
  • Jordan
00.050.10.150.2196119922023

How they compare

Bolivia currently reports 0.0146 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0075 metric tons per square kilometre in Jordan, a difference of 0.0071 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Bolivia's figure about 1.9 times Jordan's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Jordan ahead.

Bolivia ranks 198th and Jordan ranks 201st of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Bolivia averaged higher in 6 and Jordan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bolivia Jordan Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0013 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0018 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0005 metric tons per square kilometre Jordan
1970s 0.0014 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0009 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0005 metric tons per square kilometre Bolivia
1980s 0.0115 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0017 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0098 metric tons per square kilometre Bolivia
1990s 0.0089 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0048 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0041 metric tons per square kilometre Bolivia
2000s 0.0397 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0058 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0339 metric tons per square kilometre Bolivia
2010s 0.0689 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0067 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0622 metric tons per square kilometre Bolivia
2020s 0.0186 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0073 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0114 metric tons per square kilometre Bolivia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Bolivia or Jordan?
Bolivia, at 0.0146 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0075 metric tons per square kilometre in Jordan as of 2023.
What is the difference in capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Bolivia and Jordan?
0.0071 metric tons per square kilometre, with Bolivia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Jordan?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Bolivia and Jordan rank globally for capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Bolivia ranks 198th and Jordan ranks 201st of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bolivia vs Jordan: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/bolivia/jordan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/bolivia/jordan/">Bolivia vs Jordan: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Capture fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.