Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Eswatini: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Bosnia and Herzegovina
0.006 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini
0.0038 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
202nd
Eswatini rank
204th

Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Eswatini
00.0020.0040.006196819952023

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 0.006 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0038 metric tons per square kilometre in Eswatini, a difference of 0.0022 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Bosnia and Herzegovina's figure about 1.6 times Eswatini's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 202nd and Eswatini ranks 204th of 216 countries.

Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Eswatini Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0044 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0032 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0013 metric tons per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2000s 0.0056 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0034 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0022 metric tons per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2010s 0.006 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0037 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0023 metric tons per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2020s 0.006 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0037 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0023 metric tons per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Eswatini?
Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 0.006 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0038 metric tons per square kilometre in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Eswatini?
0.0022 metric tons per square kilometre, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Eswatini?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Eswatini rank globally for capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 202nd and Eswatini ranks 204th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Eswatini: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/eswatini/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Eswatini: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Capture fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.