Botswana vs Mongolia: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Botswana
0.0018 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Mongolia
0 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Botswana rank
208th
Mongolia rank
211th

Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Botswana
  • Mongolia
00.0050.010.015196119922023

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 0.0018 metric tons per square kilometre against 0 metric tons per square kilometre in Mongolia, a difference of 0.0018 metric tons per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Botswana ahead.

Botswana ranks 208th and Mongolia ranks 211th of 216 countries.

Botswana has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Mongolia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.001 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0002 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0008 metric tons per square kilometre Botswana
1970s 0.0021 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0002 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0019 metric tons per square kilometre Botswana
1980s 0.0031 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0002 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0029 metric tons per square kilometre Botswana
1990s 0.003 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0001 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0029 metric tons per square kilometre Botswana
2000s 0.0007 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0002 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0005 metric tons per square kilometre Botswana
2010s 0.0052 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0052 metric tons per square kilometre Botswana
2020s 0.0037 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0037 metric tons per square kilometre Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Botswana or Mongolia?
Botswana, at 0.0018 metric tons per square kilometre against 0 metric tons per square kilometre in Mongolia as of 2023.
What is the difference in capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Botswana and Mongolia?
0.0018 metric tons per square kilometre, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Mongolia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Mongolia rank globally for capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Botswana ranks 208th and Mongolia ranks 211th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Mongolia: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/botswana/mongolia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/botswana/mongolia/">Botswana vs Mongolia: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Capture fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.