Burkina Faso vs Guam: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Burkina Faso
0.1107 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Guam
0.1134 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Burkina Faso rank
167th
Guam rank
166th

Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Guam
00.250.50.7511.2196119922023

How they compare

Guam currently reports 0.1134 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.1107 metric tons per square kilometre in Burkina Faso, a difference of 0.0027 metric tons per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guam ahead.

Burkina Faso ranks 167th and Guam ranks 166th of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 1 and Guam in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso Guam Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0132 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1852 metric tons per square kilometre 0.172 metric tons per square kilometre Guam
1970s 0.0201 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2339 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2138 metric tons per square kilometre Guam
1980s 0.0271 metric tons per square kilometre 0.6515 metric tons per square kilometre 0.6244 metric tons per square kilometre Guam
1990s 0.0279 metric tons per square kilometre 0.6741 metric tons per square kilometre 0.6461 metric tons per square kilometre Guam
2000s 0.0348 metric tons per square kilometre 0.8398 metric tons per square kilometre 0.8051 metric tons per square kilometre Guam
2010s 0.0785 metric tons per square kilometre 0.197 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1185 metric tons per square kilometre Guam
2020s 0.1089 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0796 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0293 metric tons per square kilometre Burkina Faso

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Burkina Faso or Guam?
Guam, at 0.1134 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.1107 metric tons per square kilometre in Burkina Faso as of 2023.
What is the difference in capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Burkina Faso and Guam?
0.0027 metric tons per square kilometre, with Guam ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Guam?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Burkina Faso and Guam rank globally for capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Burkina Faso ranks 167th and Guam ranks 166th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Guam: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/guam/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/guam/">Burkina Faso vs Guam: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Capture fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.