Burundi vs Dominica: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Burundi
0.7671 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Dominica
0.692 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Burundi rank
97th
Dominica rank
100th

Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Burundi
  • Dominica
00.511.52196119922023

How they compare

Burundi currently reports 0.7671 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.692 metric tons per square kilometre in Dominica, a difference of 0.0751 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Burundi's figure about 1.1 times Dominica's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Dominica ahead.

Burundi ranks 97th and Dominica ranks 100th of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Burundi averaged higher in 1 and Dominica in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burundi Dominica Difference Ahead
1960s 0.4868 metric tons per square kilometre 0.7407 metric tons per square kilometre 0.254 metric tons per square kilometre Dominica
1970s 0.537 metric tons per square kilometre 1.1 metric tons per square kilometre 0.5676 metric tons per square kilometre Dominica
1980s 0.464 metric tons per square kilometre 1.17 metric tons per square kilometre 0.7077 metric tons per square kilometre Dominica
1990s 0.6562 metric tons per square kilometre 1.18 metric tons per square kilometre 0.5262 metric tons per square kilometre Dominica
2000s 0.5234 metric tons per square kilometre 1.16 metric tons per square kilometre 0.6325 metric tons per square kilometre Dominica
2010s 0.6665 metric tons per square kilometre 1.03 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3666 metric tons per square kilometre Dominica
2020s 0.7669 metric tons per square kilometre 0.5413 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2256 metric tons per square kilometre Burundi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Burundi or Dominica?
Burundi, at 0.7671 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.692 metric tons per square kilometre in Dominica as of 2023.
What is the difference in capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Burundi and Dominica?
0.0751 metric tons per square kilometre, with Burundi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Dominica?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Burundi and Dominica rank globally for capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Burundi ranks 97th and Dominica ranks 100th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burundi vs Dominica: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/burundi/dominica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/burundi/dominica/">Burundi vs Dominica: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Capture fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.