Burundi vs Tunisia: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Burundi
0.7671 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Tunisia
0.694 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Burundi rank
97th
Tunisia rank
99th

Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Burundi
  • Tunisia
0.20.40.60.81196119922023

How they compare

Burundi currently reports 0.7671 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.694 metric tons per square kilometre in Tunisia, a difference of 0.0731 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Burundi's figure about 1.1 times Tunisia's.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Burundi ahead.

Burundi ranks 97th and Tunisia ranks 99th of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Burundi averaged higher in 4 and Tunisia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burundi Tunisia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.4868 metric tons per square kilometre 0.162 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3247 metric tons per square kilometre Burundi
1970s 0.537 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2684 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2686 metric tons per square kilometre Burundi
1980s 0.464 metric tons per square kilometre 0.5131 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0491 metric tons per square kilometre Tunisia
1990s 0.6562 metric tons per square kilometre 0.5525 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1037 metric tons per square kilometre Burundi
2000s 0.5234 metric tons per square kilometre 0.6463 metric tons per square kilometre 0.123 metric tons per square kilometre Tunisia
2010s 0.6665 metric tons per square kilometre 0.6928 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0263 metric tons per square kilometre Tunisia
2020s 0.7669 metric tons per square kilometre 0.6878 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0791 metric tons per square kilometre Burundi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Burundi or Tunisia?
Burundi, at 0.7671 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.694 metric tons per square kilometre in Tunisia as of 2023.
What is the difference in capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Burundi and Tunisia?
0.0731 metric tons per square kilometre, with Burundi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Tunisia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Burundi and Tunisia rank globally for capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Burundi ranks 97th and Tunisia ranks 99th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burundi vs Tunisia: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/burundi/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/burundi/tunisia/">Burundi vs Tunisia: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Capture fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.