Cambodia vs Low income: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Cambodia
3.13 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Low income
0.2198 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Cambodia rank
48th
Low income rank
46th

Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Cambodia
  • Low income
01234196119922023

How they compare

Cambodia currently reports 3.13 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.2198 metric tons per square kilometre in Low income, a difference of 2.91 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Cambodia's figure about 14.2 times Low income's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cambodia ahead.

Cambodia ranks 48th and Low income ranks 46th of 216 countries.

Cambodia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cambodia Low income Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2593 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0829 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1764 metric tons per square kilometre Cambodia
1970s 0.4027 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1263 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2764 metric tons per square kilometre Cambodia
1980s 0.369 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1531 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2159 metric tons per square kilometre Cambodia
1990s 0.7574 metric tons per square kilometre 0.119 metric tons per square kilometre 0.6384 metric tons per square kilometre Cambodia
2000s 2.83 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1443 metric tons per square kilometre 2.69 metric tons per square kilometre Cambodia
2010s 3.45 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1702 metric tons per square kilometre 3.28 metric tons per square kilometre Cambodia
2020s 3.01 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2016 metric tons per square kilometre 2.81 metric tons per square kilometre Cambodia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Cambodia or Low income?
Cambodia, at 3.13 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.2198 metric tons per square kilometre in Low income as of 2023.
What is the difference in capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Cambodia and Low income?
2.91 metric tons per square kilometre, with Cambodia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Low income?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cambodia and Low income rank globally for capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Cambodia ranks 48th and Low income ranks 46th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cambodia vs Low income: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/cambodia/low-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/cambodia/low-income/">Cambodia vs Low income: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Capture fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.