Central African Republic vs Czechia: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Central African Republic
0.0466 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Czechia
0.0437 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Central African Republic rank
179th
Czechia rank
181st

Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Czechia
00.020.040.06196119922023

How they compare

Central African Republic currently reports 0.0466 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0437 metric tons per square kilometre in Czechia, a difference of 0.0029 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Central African Republic's figure about 1.1 times Czechia's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Czechia ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 179th and Czechia ranks 181st of 216 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 2 and Czechia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Czechia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0225 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0482 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0256 metric tons per square kilometre Czechia
2000s 0.0385 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0587 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0202 metric tons per square kilometre Czechia
2010s 0.049 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0489 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0001 metric tons per square kilometre Central African Republic
2020s 0.0455 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0447 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0009 metric tons per square kilometre Central African Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Central African Republic or Czechia?
Central African Republic, at 0.0466 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0437 metric tons per square kilometre in Czechia as of 2023.
What is the difference in capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Central African Republic and Czechia?
0.0029 metric tons per square kilometre, with Central African Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Czechia?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Central African Republic and Czechia rank globally for capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Central African Republic ranks 179th and Czechia ranks 181st of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Czechia: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/czechia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/czechia/">Central African Republic vs Czechia: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Capture fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.