Chile vs French Polynesia: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Chile
3.5 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
French Polynesia
3.64 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
44th
French Polynesia rank
41st

Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Chile
  • French Polynesia
02.557.510196119922023

How they compare

French Polynesia currently reports 3.64 metric tons per square kilometre against 3.5 metric tons per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 0.14 metric tons per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was French Polynesia ahead.

Chile ranks 44th and French Polynesia ranks 41st of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 5 and French Polynesia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile French Polynesia Difference Ahead
1960s 1.31 metric tons per square kilometre 0.6406 metric tons per square kilometre 0.6695 metric tons per square kilometre Chile
1970s 1.87 metric tons per square kilometre 0.6845 metric tons per square kilometre 1.19 metric tons per square kilometre Chile
1980s 6.26 metric tons per square kilometre 0.7113 metric tons per square kilometre 5.55 metric tons per square kilometre Chile
1990s 8.22 metric tons per square kilometre 2.27 metric tons per square kilometre 5.95 metric tons per square kilometre Chile
2000s 5.84 metric tons per square kilometre 3.85 metric tons per square kilometre 2 metric tons per square kilometre Chile
2010s 3.43 metric tons per square kilometre 3.85 metric tons per square kilometre 0.4264 metric tons per square kilometre French Polynesia
2020s 3.32 metric tons per square kilometre 3.51 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1906 metric tons per square kilometre French Polynesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Chile or French Polynesia?
French Polynesia, at 3.64 metric tons per square kilometre against 3.5 metric tons per square kilometre in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Chile and French Polynesia?
0.14 metric tons per square kilometre, with French Polynesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and French Polynesia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chile and French Polynesia rank globally for capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Chile ranks 44th and French Polynesia ranks 41st of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs French Polynesia: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/chile/french-polynesia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/chile/french-polynesia/">Chile vs French Polynesia: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Capture fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.