Colombia vs Finland: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Colombia
0.3841 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Finland
0.4235 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Colombia rank
129th
Finland rank
127th

Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Colombia
  • Finland
00.20.40.60.81196119922023

How they compare

Finland currently reports 0.4235 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.3841 metric tons per square kilometre in Colombia, a difference of 0.0394 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Finland's figure about 1.1 times Colombia's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Finland ahead.

Colombia ranks 129th and Finland ranks 127th of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Colombia averaged higher in 2 and Finland in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Colombia Finland Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0534 metric tons per square kilometre 0.245 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1916 metric tons per square kilometre Finland
1970s 0.0648 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3537 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2889 metric tons per square kilometre Finland
1980s 0.0832 metric tons per square kilometre 0.5223 metric tons per square kilometre 0.439 metric tons per square kilometre Finland
1990s 0.5476 metric tons per square kilometre 0.52 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0276 metric tons per square kilometre Colombia
2000s 0.6895 metric tons per square kilometre 0.4789 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2106 metric tons per square kilometre Colombia
2010s 0.5671 metric tons per square kilometre 0.5697 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0026 metric tons per square kilometre Finland
2020s 0.4018 metric tons per square kilometre 0.4424 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0406 metric tons per square kilometre Finland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Colombia or Finland?
Finland, at 0.4235 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.3841 metric tons per square kilometre in Colombia as of 2023.
What is the difference in capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Colombia and Finland?
0.0394 metric tons per square kilometre, with Finland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Finland?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Colombia and Finland rank globally for capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Colombia ranks 129th and Finland ranks 127th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Colombia vs Finland: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/colombia/finland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/colombia/finland/">Colombia vs Finland: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Capture fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.