Colombia vs Uruguay: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Colombia
0.3841 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Uruguay
0.3834 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Colombia rank
129th
Uruguay rank
130th

Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Colombia
  • Uruguay
00.20.40.60.81196119922023

How they compare

Colombia currently reports 0.3841 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.3834 metric tons per square kilometre in Uruguay, a difference of 0.0007 metric tons per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Uruguay ahead.

Colombia ranks 129th and Uruguay ranks 130th of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Colombia averaged higher in 3 and Uruguay in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Colombia Uruguay Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0534 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1276 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0741 metric tons per square kilometre Uruguay
1970s 0.0648 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2953 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2305 metric tons per square kilometre Uruguay
1980s 0.0832 metric tons per square kilometre 0.781 metric tons per square kilometre 0.6978 metric tons per square kilometre Uruguay
1990s 0.5476 metric tons per square kilometre 0.7114 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1638 metric tons per square kilometre Uruguay
2000s 0.6895 metric tons per square kilometre 0.6431 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0464 metric tons per square kilometre Colombia
2010s 0.5671 metric tons per square kilometre 0.388 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1791 metric tons per square kilometre Colombia
2020s 0.4018 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3789 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0229 metric tons per square kilometre Colombia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Colombia or Uruguay?
Colombia, at 0.3841 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.3834 metric tons per square kilometre in Uruguay as of 2023.
What is the difference in capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Colombia and Uruguay?
0.0007 metric tons per square kilometre, with Colombia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Uruguay?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Colombia and Uruguay rank globally for capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Colombia ranks 129th and Uruguay ranks 130th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Colombia vs Uruguay: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/colombia/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/colombia/uruguay/">Colombia vs Uruguay: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Capture fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.