Congo vs Honduras: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Congo
0.1764 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Honduras
0.1857 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
153rd
Honduras rank
151st

Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Congo
  • Honduras
00.10.20.3196119922023

How they compare

Honduras currently reports 0.1857 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.1764 metric tons per square kilometre in Congo, a difference of 0.0093 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Honduras's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 153rd and Honduras ranks 151st of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 4 and Honduras in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Honduras Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0389 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0326 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0063 metric tons per square kilometre Congo
1970s 0.0677 metric tons per square kilometre 0.05 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0177 metric tons per square kilometre Congo
1980s 0.1025 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1349 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0324 metric tons per square kilometre Honduras
1990s 0.1286 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2185 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0899 metric tons per square kilometre Honduras
2000s 0.1598 metric tons per square kilometre 0.162 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0022 metric tons per square kilometre Honduras
2010s 0.2304 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1055 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1249 metric tons per square kilometre Congo
2020s 0.1936 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1754 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0182 metric tons per square kilometre Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Congo or Honduras?
Honduras, at 0.1857 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.1764 metric tons per square kilometre in Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Congo and Honduras?
0.0093 metric tons per square kilometre, with Honduras ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Honduras?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Congo and Honduras rank globally for capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Congo ranks 153rd and Honduras ranks 151st of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Honduras: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/honduras/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/honduras/">Congo vs Honduras: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Capture fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.