Congo vs Suriname: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Congo
0.1764 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Suriname
0.1985 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
153rd
Suriname rank
150th

Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Congo
  • Suriname
00.10.20.3196119922023

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 0.1985 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.1764 metric tons per square kilometre in Congo, a difference of 0.0221 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Suriname's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.

The two have swapped places 16 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Suriname ahead.

Congo ranks 153rd and Suriname ranks 150th of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 3 and Suriname in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Suriname Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0389 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0424 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0036 metric tons per square kilometre Suriname
1970s 0.0677 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0564 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0113 metric tons per square kilometre Congo
1980s 0.1025 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0315 metric tons per square kilometre 0.071 metric tons per square kilometre Congo
1990s 0.1286 metric tons per square kilometre 0.09 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0386 metric tons per square kilometre Congo
2000s 0.1598 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1836 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0238 metric tons per square kilometre Suriname
2010s 0.2304 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2351 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0047 metric tons per square kilometre Suriname
2020s 0.1936 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1984 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0049 metric tons per square kilometre Suriname

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Congo or Suriname?
Suriname, at 0.1985 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.1764 metric tons per square kilometre in Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Congo and Suriname?
0.0221 metric tons per square kilometre, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Suriname?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Congo and Suriname rank globally for capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Congo ranks 153rd and Suriname ranks 150th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Suriname: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/suriname/">Congo vs Suriname: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Capture fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.