Costa Rica vs Haiti: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Costa Rica
0.5724 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Haiti
0.5958 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Costa Rica rank
107th
Haiti rank
104th

Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Haiti
00.20.40.6196119922023

How they compare

Haiti currently reports 0.5958 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.5724 metric tons per square kilometre in Costa Rica, a difference of 0.0234 metric tons per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Haiti ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 107th and Haiti ranks 104th of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 4 and Haiti in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Haiti Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0657 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1197 metric tons per square kilometre 0.054 metric tons per square kilometre Haiti
1970s 0.2904 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1486 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1418 metric tons per square kilometre Costa Rica
1980s 0.3261 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2145 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1116 metric tons per square kilometre Costa Rica
1990s 0.4013 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2093 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1919 metric tons per square kilometre Costa Rica
2000s 0.4963 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3951 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1012 metric tons per square kilometre Costa Rica
2010s 0.2965 metric tons per square kilometre 0.5878 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2913 metric tons per square kilometre Haiti
2020s 0.5835 metric tons per square kilometre 0.596 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0125 metric tons per square kilometre Haiti

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Costa Rica or Haiti?
Haiti, at 0.5958 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.5724 metric tons per square kilometre in Costa Rica as of 2023.
What is the difference in capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Costa Rica and Haiti?
0.0234 metric tons per square kilometre, with Haiti ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Haiti?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Costa Rica and Haiti rank globally for capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Costa Rica ranks 107th and Haiti ranks 104th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Haiti: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/haiti/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/haiti/">Costa Rica vs Haiti: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Capture fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.