Costa Rica vs Tanzania: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Costa Rica
0.5724 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania
0.5434 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Costa Rica rank
107th
Tanzania rank
110th

Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Tanzania
00.20.40.6196119922023

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 0.5724 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.5434 metric tons per square kilometre in Tanzania, a difference of 0.029 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.1 times Tanzania's.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Tanzania ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 107th and Tanzania ranks 110th of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 4 and Tanzania in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0657 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1227 metric tons per square kilometre 0.057 metric tons per square kilometre Tanzania
1970s 0.2904 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2243 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0662 metric tons per square kilometre Costa Rica
1980s 0.3261 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3352 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0091 metric tons per square kilometre Tanzania
1990s 0.4013 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3877 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0136 metric tons per square kilometre Costa Rica
2000s 0.4963 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3987 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0977 metric tons per square kilometre Costa Rica
2010s 0.2965 metric tons per square kilometre 0.4284 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1319 metric tons per square kilometre Tanzania
2020s 0.5835 metric tons per square kilometre 0.5384 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0451 metric tons per square kilometre Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Costa Rica or Tanzania?
Costa Rica, at 0.5724 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.5434 metric tons per square kilometre in Tanzania as of 2023.
What is the difference in capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Costa Rica and Tanzania?
0.029 metric tons per square kilometre, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Tanzania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Costa Rica and Tanzania rank globally for capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Costa Rica ranks 107th and Tanzania ranks 110th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Tanzania: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/tanzania/">Costa Rica vs Tanzania: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Capture fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.