Cote d'Ivoire vs Kenya: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Cote d'Ivoire
0.2399 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Kenya
0.2319 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Cote d'Ivoire rank
144th
Kenya rank
146th

Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Cote d'Ivoire
  • Kenya
00.10.20.30.4196119922023

How they compare

Cote d'Ivoire currently reports 0.2399 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.2319 metric tons per square kilometre in Kenya, a difference of 0.008 metric tons per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cote d'Ivoire ahead.

Cote d'Ivoire ranks 144th and Kenya ranks 146th of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cote d'Ivoire averaged higher in 3 and Kenya in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cote d'Ivoire Kenya Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1775 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0413 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1362 metric tons per square kilometre Cote d'Ivoire
1970s 0.2153 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0631 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1522 metric tons per square kilometre Cote d'Ivoire
1980s 0.273 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1808 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0922 metric tons per square kilometre Cote d'Ivoire
1990s 0.242 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3319 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0899 metric tons per square kilometre Kenya
2000s 0.1827 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2706 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0879 metric tons per square kilometre Kenya
2010s 0.2524 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2797 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0273 metric tons per square kilometre Kenya
2020s 0.2227 metric tons per square kilometre 0.244 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0213 metric tons per square kilometre Kenya

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Cote d'Ivoire or Kenya?
Cote d'Ivoire, at 0.2399 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.2319 metric tons per square kilometre in Kenya as of 2023.
What is the difference in capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Cote d'Ivoire and Kenya?
0.008 metric tons per square kilometre, with Cote d'Ivoire ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cote d'Ivoire and Kenya?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cote d'Ivoire and Kenya rank globally for capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Cote d'Ivoire ranks 144th and Kenya ranks 146th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cote d'Ivoire vs Kenya: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/cote-d-ivoire/kenya/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/cote-d-ivoire/kenya/">Cote d'Ivoire vs Kenya: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Capture fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.