Curacao vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Curacao
5.07 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
0.3545 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Curacao rank
37th
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank
38th

Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Curacao
  • Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
020406080196119922023

How they compare

Curacao currently reports 5.07 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.3545 metric tons per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income), a difference of 4.72 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Curacao's figure about 14.3 times Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)'s.

Across all 13 years both countries report, Curacao has been ahead every year.

Curacao ranks 37th and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 38th of 216 countries.

Curacao has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Curacao Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) Difference Ahead
2010s 66.88 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3131 metric tons per square kilometre 66.57 metric tons per square kilometre Curacao
2020s 33.33 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3447 metric tons per square kilometre 32.99 metric tons per square kilometre Curacao

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Curacao or Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
Curacao, at 5.07 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.3545 metric tons per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) as of 2023.
What is the difference in capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Curacao and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
4.72 metric tons per square kilometre, with Curacao ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Curacao and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
13 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2023.
How do Curacao and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank globally for capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Curacao ranks 37th and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 38th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Curacao vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/curacao/sub-saharan-africa-excluding-high-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/curacao/sub-saharan-africa-excluding-high-income/">Curacao vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Capture fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.