Cyprus vs Somalia: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Cyprus
0.1325 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Somalia
0.158 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Cyprus rank
159th
Somalia rank
156th

Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Cyprus
  • Somalia
051015196119922023

How they compare

Somalia currently reports 0.158 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.1325 metric tons per square kilometre in Cyprus, a difference of 0.0255 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Somalia's figure about 1.2 times Cyprus's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cyprus ahead.

Cyprus ranks 159th and Somalia ranks 156th of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cyprus averaged higher in 6 and Somalia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cyprus Somalia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0968 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0074 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0894 metric tons per square kilometre Cyprus
1970s 0.133 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0122 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1207 metric tons per square kilometre Cyprus
1980s 0.2266 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0258 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2008 metric tons per square kilometre Cyprus
1990s 1.51 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0439 metric tons per square kilometre 1.47 metric tons per square kilometre Cyprus
2000s 5.28 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0462 metric tons per square kilometre 5.23 metric tons per square kilometre Cyprus
2010s 0.1531 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0825 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0705 metric tons per square kilometre Cyprus
2020s 0.1434 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1528 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0094 metric tons per square kilometre Somalia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Cyprus or Somalia?
Somalia, at 0.158 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.1325 metric tons per square kilometre in Cyprus as of 2023.
What is the difference in capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Cyprus and Somalia?
0.0255 metric tons per square kilometre, with Somalia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Somalia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cyprus and Somalia rank globally for capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Cyprus ranks 159th and Somalia ranks 156th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cyprus vs Somalia: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/cyprus/somalia-fed-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/cyprus/somalia-fed-rep/">Cyprus vs Somalia: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Capture fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.