Denmark vs South Korea: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Denmark
12.38 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
South Korea
14.2 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Denmark rank
16th
South Korea rank
15th

Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Denmark
  • South Korea
01020304050196119922023

How they compare

South Korea currently reports 14.2 metric tons per square kilometre against 12.38 metric tons per square kilometre in Denmark, a difference of 1.82 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes South Korea's figure about 1.1 times Denmark's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Denmark ahead.

Denmark ranks 16th and South Korea ranks 15th of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Denmark averaged higher in 6 and South Korea in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark South Korea Difference Ahead
1960s 23.78 metric tons per square kilometre 6 metric tons per square kilometre 17.78 metric tons per square kilometre Denmark
1970s 40.49 metric tons per square kilometre 16.12 metric tons per square kilometre 24.37 metric tons per square kilometre Denmark
1980s 46.39 metric tons per square kilometre 23.47 metric tons per square kilometre 22.92 metric tons per square kilometre Denmark
1990s 42.91 metric tons per square kilometre 23.73 metric tons per square kilometre 19.18 metric tons per square kilometre Denmark
2000s 26.29 metric tons per square kilometre 18.56 metric tons per square kilometre 7.73 metric tons per square kilometre Denmark
2010s 18.33 metric tons per square kilometre 16.18 metric tons per square kilometre 2.15 metric tons per square kilometre Denmark
2020s 13.46 metric tons per square kilometre 13.86 metric tons per square kilometre 0.4095 metric tons per square kilometre South Korea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Denmark or South Korea?
South Korea, at 14.2 metric tons per square kilometre against 12.38 metric tons per square kilometre in Denmark as of 2023.
What is the difference in capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Denmark and South Korea?
1.82 metric tons per square kilometre, with South Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and South Korea?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Denmark and South Korea rank globally for capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Denmark ranks 16th and South Korea ranks 15th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Denmark vs South Korea: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/denmark/korea-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/denmark/korea-rep/">Denmark vs South Korea: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Capture fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.